I want to be direct as much as possible but I think compliement openers can be vague sometimes. Many of the girls thats are hooked often later on tells me they have a boyfriend when I ask them about it. Is that a good idea?

what is your experience? Maybe its just me but going "direct" don't seem to filter them out for some reason.

Is it just me or is the website not working properly? I was able to get on it few days ago but now I can't because it has virus or something according to my window protection

I think it was mentioned in the Gblueprint that there will be a DVD coming out full of Yad's infield footages. Any news on that or Yads decide to be gay instead and not release one because he's shit?

Been watching lot of daygame blueprint lately and something I have noticed about Yad, he doesn't actually go direct. Instead, he keep it ambiguous so girls can't disqualifies him straight away because they're not sure about his intent.

e.g. Yad: "I just think I should come over and say Hi because...(pause) we are wearing the same coloured shirts and you...(pause) look like you're from a cold country. e.g. Yad: "excuse me, sorry for stopping you but I just want to say that you look really really nice. (then observational opener)"

This is something I don't like about daygame.com and many other professionals in whatever field:

"what they teach and what they actually do are completely different"

Same with top Poker players, they tell you to only play premium cards, be patient and stay cool but then they go off and do something opposite. When Andy was explaining the importance of being non-apologetic, he then showed a video of Yad approaching different girls with "excuse me, sorry for stopping you, can I say something quickly?" Some of you may argue that it is not about the content but all about sub communication which I agree, but they should mention that. They also claim to be teaching direct and authentic natural game and yet Yad doesn't go direct himself. By direct I mean when the intent is expressed upfront so the woman know what you want right away.

Now we all know Yad is not attractive look wise so I think that explains alot why he had find an alternative way to get around that. He must've realised that after years of doing it. Now, if you look like a male model then you're more likely to get the girl to stay and talk to you even if they have a bf or not interested. If you look like a Yad however and go direct with sub-communication of "I think you're beautiful and I want a date with you" then he will get blown outs or get disqualified. This is because a judgement/decision is made BEFORE he was able to demonstrate anything else. So keeping it vague and quickly transition into something more interesting will give him more opportunities.   

Like or not, game is a numbers game just like in sales. Some sales gurus argue that you must not think like that because you will miss out lot of opportunities same applies to daygame so we should make the most out of each girl we approach. We can't do that if we approach them in a way where we don't have a chance to demonstrate any else because they are forced to make a decision on the spot.

So maybe direct is not the best way to go?

Its just an observation. what do you all think?

Saw this on Krauser's blog last night and it grabbed my attention immediately. It felt like it was talking to me directly.

There?s alot of guys out there who are hitting the streets on a regular basis, opening sets, running the model and?? not getting laid. Oh dear.

Daygame is not a hobby. If you?re approaching it with the same attitude you?d take to aircraft modelling, video games, stamp collecting or whatever then you are hamstringing yourself. I understand why people do it this way. It?s new, it?s exciting and you have approach anxiety so you have to make a game of it to reduce the ego strain. I get that. Fine. But at some point you have to move past it.

I think thats probably why I'm not getting better at it. Not enough commitment and focus.

what do you all think?

I just noticed something about Yad, he doesn't always go direct. Sometimes he just goes in with an observational opener then very quickly transition into something.

Do you all go direction majority of time? I think apart from direct, observational openers are the only ones that I can think of that can stop a fast moving set.

Saw this thread from the LSS:

http://www.thelss.com/forum/index.php?topic=28932.0

I agree with points such as:

"Direct Game" in the Alan Currie style* Leaves you and the girl very little room to maneuver. You are asking her to commit far too much in a very, very short amount of time. It may work 20% of the time and if you're happy with that carry on. But you'll get the other 80% feeling awkward and feeding you a line to get rid of you.

To give a simplified example. Think of it in traffic light terms. You run that same "oh, I had to tell you you're sexy as hell" line. 20% will give you a green light. The other 80% will be either Red. If you'd run a less pressurised line. You could have converted some of those Red to Ambers and MAYBE with a little time/exposure to Greens.

If you approach "very attractive english women" during the day time. A few reasons:

- she is very attractive so not a surprise that she already has a boyfriend
- she is english so already have 10 guys in her social circle who want to be the next boyfriend
- she is out of your ligue (like you are a 5 & she is a 9)
- a problem with your approach
- she is not in the mood so "i have a boyfriend" is the main answer to get rid of guys

Too many girls just use "I have a boyfriend" response to get rid of strangers and many hot girls WILL have boyfriends. However, the definition of "boyfriend" is very vague and can mean many different things such as:

- Fiance
- Live-in partner
- Regular long-term romantic relationship
- Recent acquisition she's besotted with
- A guy she sees once every week or two for socialising & sex
- A dude she's dated a few times & slept with once or twice
- A fuckbuddy
- This guy she meets up with occasionally when she's horny
- Some boring orbiter who takes her out to dinner but doesn't escalate
- The guy she's hoping will ask her out
- A complete lie

I think Yad often goes in with a compliement or something observant but without going too direct. He's got great skills so I think unless the girl is in a serious relationship, there's a ood chance that Yad will end up sleeping with her.

Open less direct also give you a chance to talk to her bit more.

what do you guys think?